Dannii Willis
"Refactors the Startup Rules so that it can be more easily altered"
"A general purpose benchmarking test framework that produces statistically significant results. Version 2 works with 6M62."
"Better performance for the Flex/Block value systems using Glulx's native malloc features"
C by Dannii Willis Version 1/150829
"A code golfing library by Dannii Willis"
ni
++ 0% (Reading text)++ 5% (Analysing sentences)
The extension C by Dannii Willis, which your source text makes use of,
seems to be misidentified: its 'begins here' sentence declares it as
'Version 1/150829 of C by G'. (Perhaps it was wrongly installed?)
++ Ended: Translation failed: 1 problem found
"Provides support for array and map data structures"
"Provides support for some additional data structures"
ni
++ 0% (Reading text)++ 5% (Analysing sentences)
++ 15% (Drawing inferences)
++ 20% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 23% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 26% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 29% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 32% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 35% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 38% (Binding rulebooks)
In Chapter - Anys in the extension Data Structures by Dannii Willis:
The phrase you describe in 'To decide which any is (V - value of kind K)
as an any' data
structures by dannii willis seems to be trying to decide a value, but 'any'
is not a kind that I recognise. (I had expected something like 'number' or
'object' - see the Kinds index for what's available.)
In 'To say kind/type of (A - any)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'any' after the hyphen
should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a number', or 'a
vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To decide if kind/type of (A - any) is (name of kind of value K)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'any' after the hyphen
should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a number', or 'a
vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To if kind/type/-- of/-- (A - any) is (name of kind of value K) let
(V - nonexisting K variable) be the value begin -- end loop' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'any' after the hyphen
should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a number', or 'a
vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The phrase you describe in 'To decide what K result is (A - any) as a/an
(name of kind of value K)' data structures by dannii
willis seems to be trying to decide a value,
but 'K result' is not a kind that I recognise. (I had expected something
like 'number' or 'object' - see the Kinds index for what's available.)
In 'To decide what K result is (A - any) as a/an (name of kind of value
K)' (Dannii Willis/Data Structures.i7x, line 308),
the text 'any' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here
(like 'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To decide what K is (A - any) as a/an (name of kind of value K) or
(backup - K)' data
structures by dannii willis, the text 'any' after the hyphen should tell me
what kind of value goes here (like 'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's
not something I recognise.
In Chapter - Closures - Initialising and updating in the extension Data
Structures by Dannii Willis:
In 'To initialise (C - closure value of kind K -> value of kind L) with
parameter (P1 - nonexisting K variable)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'closure value of kind K ->
value of kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes
here (like 'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To decide if (C - closure value of kind K -> value of kind L) is
initialised' data
structures by dannii willis, the text 'closure value of kind K -> value of
kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (C - closure value of kind K ->
value of kind L) is initialised' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (A - any) as
a/an (name of kind of value K) or (backup - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (C - closure value of kind K ->
value of kind L) is initialised' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K result is (A -
any) as a/an (name of kind of value K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
In 'To update all local variables of (C - closure value of kind K ->
value of kind L)' data
structures by dannii willis, the text 'closure value of kind K -> value of
kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In Chapter - Closures - Running in the extension Data Structures by Dannii
Willis:
The phrase you describe in 'To decide what L result is (C - closure
value of kind K -> value of kind L) applied to (P1 - K)' data structures by dannii
willis seems to be trying to decide a value,
but 'L result' is not a kind that I recognise. (I had expected something
like 'number' or 'object' - see the Kinds index for what's available.)
In 'To decide what L result is (C - closure value of kind K -> value of
kind L) applied to (P1 - K)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'closure value of kind K ->
value of kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes
here (like 'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide what L result is (C - closure
value of kind K -> value of kind L) applied to (P1 - K)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (A - any) as
a/an (name of kind of value K) or (backup - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
In Chapter - Couples in the extension Data Structures by Dannii Willis:
The phrase you describe in 'To decide what couple of K and L is (V1 -
value of kind K) and (V2 - value of kind L) as a couple' data structures by dannii
willis seems to be trying to decide a value,
but 'couple of K and L' is not a kind that I recognise. (I had expected
something like 'number' or 'object' - see the Kinds index for what's
available.)
In 'To decide what K is first value of (C - couple of value of kind K
and value of kind L)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'couple of value of kind K
and value of kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value
goes here (like 'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I
recognise.
In 'To decide what L is second value of (C - couple of value of kind K
and value of kind L)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'couple of value of kind K
and value of kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value
goes here (like 'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I
recognise.
In 'To decide what K is (C - couple of value of kind K and value of kind
L) => 1' data
structures by dannii willis, the text 'couple of value of kind K and value of
kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To decide what L is (C - couple of value of kind K and value of kind
L) => 2' data
structures by dannii willis, the text 'couple of value of kind K and value of
kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In Chapter - Maps - Creating in the extension Data Structures by Dannii
Willis:
The phrase you describe in 'To decide which map of value of kind K to
value of kind L is a/-- new map of (name of kind of value K) to (name of
kind of value L)' data
structures by dannii willis seems to be trying to decide a value, but 'map
of value of kind K to value of kind L' is not a kind that I recognise. (I
had expected something like 'number' or 'object' - see the Kinds index for
what's available.)
The phrase you describe in 'To decide which map of value of kind K to
value of kind L is clone of (M - map of value of kind K to value of kind
L)' (Dannii Willis/Data Structures.i7x, line 1192)
seems to be trying to decide a value, but 'map of value of kind K to value
of kind L' is not a kind that I recognise. (I had expected something like
'number' or 'object' - see the Kinds index for what's available.)
In 'To decide which map of value of kind K to value of kind L is clone
of (M - map of value of kind K to value of kind L)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of value of kind K to
value of kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes
here (like 'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In Chapter - Maps - Writing in the extension Data Structures by Dannii
Willis:
In 'To set key (key - K) in/of (M - map of value of kind K to value of
kind L) to/= (val - L)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of value of kind K to
value of kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes
here (like 'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To set key (key - K) in/of (M - map of value of kind K to any) to/=
(val - value of kind V)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of value of kind K to
any' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a
number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To set key (key - value of kind K) in/of (M - map of any to value of
kind L) to/= (val - L)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of any to value of
kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To set key (key - value of kind K) in/of (M - map of any to any)
to/= (val - value of kind V)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of any to any' after
the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a number', or
'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To (M - map of value of kind K to value of kind L) => (key - K) =
(val - L)' data
structures by dannii willis, the text 'map of value of kind K to value of
kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of value of kind K to value of
kind L) => (key - K) = (val - L)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L is (C - couple
of value of kind K and value of kind L) => 2' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of value of kind K to value of
kind L) => (key - K) = (val - L)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (C - couple
of value of kind K and value of kind L) => 1' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of value of kind K to value of
kind L) => (key - K) = (val - L)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (A - any)
as a/an (name of kind of value K) or (backup - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of value of kind K to value of
kind L) => (key - K) = (val - L)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L result is (C -
closure value of kind K -> value of kind L) applied to (P1 - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of value of kind K to value of
kind L) => (key - K) = (val - L)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K result is (A -
any) as a/an (name of kind of value K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of value of kind K to value of
kind L) => (key - K) = (val - L)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide if (C - closure value
of kind K -> value of kind L) is initialised' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
In 'To (M - map of value of kind K to any) => (key - K) = (val - value
of kind V)' data
structures by dannii willis, the text 'map of value of kind K to any' after
the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a number', or
'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of value of kind K to any) =>
(key - K) = (val - value of kind V)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L is (C - couple
of value of kind K and value of kind L) => 2' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of value of kind K to any) =>
(key - K) = (val - value of kind V)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (C - couple
of value of kind K and value of kind L) => 1' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of value of kind K to any) =>
(key - K) = (val - value of kind V)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (A - any)
as a/an (name of kind of value K) or (backup - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of value of kind K to any) =>
(key - K) = (val - value of kind V)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L result is (C -
closure value of kind K -> value of kind L) applied to (P1 - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of value of kind K to any) =>
(key - K) = (val - value of kind V)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K result is (A -
any) as a/an (name of kind of value K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of value of kind K to any) =>
(key - K) = (val - value of kind V)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide if (C - closure value
of kind K -> value of kind L) is initialised' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
In 'To (M - map of any to value of kind L) => (key - value of kind K) =
(val - L)' data
structures by dannii willis, the text 'map of any to value of kind L' after
the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a number', or
'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of any to value of kind L) =>
(key - value of kind K) = (val - L)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L is (C - couple
of value of kind K and value of kind L) => 2' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of any to value of kind L) =>
(key - value of kind K) = (val - L)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (C - couple
of value of kind K and value of kind L) => 1' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of any to value of kind L) =>
(key - value of kind K) = (val - L)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (A - any)
as a/an (name of kind of value K) or (backup - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of any to value of kind L) =>
(key - value of kind K) = (val - L)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L result is (C -
closure value of kind K -> value of kind L) applied to (P1 - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of any to value of kind L) =>
(key - value of kind K) = (val - L)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K result is (A -
any) as a/an (name of kind of value K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of any to value of kind L) =>
(key - value of kind K) = (val - L)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide if (C - closure value
of kind K -> value of kind L) is initialised' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
In 'To (M - map of any to any) => (key - value of kind K) = (val - value
of kind V)' data
structures by dannii willis, the text 'map of any to any' after the hyphen
should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a number', or 'a
vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of any to any) => (key - value
of kind K) = (val - value of kind V)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L is (C - couple
of value of kind K and value of kind L) => 2' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of any to any) => (key - value
of kind K) = (val - value of kind V)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (C - couple
of value of kind K and value of kind L) => 1' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of any to any) => (key - value
of kind K) = (val - value of kind V)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (A - any)
as a/an (name of kind of value K) or (backup - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of any to any) => (key - value
of kind K) = (val - value of kind V)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L result is (C -
closure value of kind K -> value of kind L) applied to (P1 - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of any to any) => (key - value
of kind K) = (val - value of kind V)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K result is (A -
any) as a/an (name of kind of value K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To (M - map of any to any) => (key - value
of kind K) = (val - value of kind V)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide if (C - closure value
of kind K -> value of kind L) is initialised' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
In Chapter - Maps - Checking keys in the extension Data Structures by Dannii
Willis:
In 'To decide if (M - map of value of kind K to value of kind L) has key
(key - K)' data
structures by dannii willis, the text 'map of value of kind K to value of
kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (M - map of value of kind K to
value of kind L) has key (key - K)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L is (C - couple
of value of kind K and value of kind L) => 2' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (M - map of value of kind K to
value of kind L) has key (key - K)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (C - couple
of value of kind K and value of kind L) => 1' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (M - map of value of kind K to
value of kind L) has key (key - K)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (A - any)
as a/an (name of kind of value K) or (backup - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (M - map of value of kind K to
value of kind L) has key (key - K)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L result is (C -
closure value of kind K -> value of kind L) applied to (P1 - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (M - map of value of kind K to
value of kind L) has key (key - K)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K result is (A -
any) as a/an (name of kind of value K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
In 'To decide if (M - map of any to value of kind L) has key (key -
value of kind K)' data
structures by dannii willis, the text 'map of any to value of kind L' after
the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a number', or
'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (M - map of any to value of
kind L) has key (key - value of kind K)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L is (C - couple
of value of kind K and value of kind L) => 2' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (M - map of any to value of
kind L) has key (key - value of kind K)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (C - couple
of value of kind K and value of kind L) => 1' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (M - map of any to value of
kind L) has key (key - value of kind K)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (A - any)
as a/an (name of kind of value K) or (backup - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (M - map of any to value of
kind L) has key (key - value of kind K)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L result is (C -
closure value of kind K -> value of kind L) applied to (P1 - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (M - map of any to value of
kind L) has key (key - value of kind K)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K result is (A -
any) as a/an (name of kind of value K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
In 'To if (M - map of value of kind K to value of kind L) has key (key -
K) let (V - nonexisting L variable) be the value begin -- end loop' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of value of kind K to
value of kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes
here (like 'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To if (M - map of any to value of kind L) has key (key - value of
kind K) let (V - nonexisting L variable) be the value begin -- end loop' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of any to value of
kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In Chapter - Maps - Reading in the extension Data Structures by Dannii
Willis:
The phrase you describe in 'To decide what L option is get key (key - K)
in/from/of (M - map of value of kind K to value of kind L)' data structures by dannii
willis seems to be trying to decide a
value, but 'L option' is not a kind that I recognise. (I had expected
something like 'number' or 'object' - see the Kinds index for what's
available.)
In 'To decide what L option is get key (key - K) in/from/of (M - map of
value of kind K to value of kind L)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of value of kind K to
value of kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes
here (like 'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The phrase you describe in 'To decide what L option is get key (key -
value of kind K) in/from/of (M - map of any to value of kind L)' data structures by dannii
willis seems to be trying to decide a
value, but 'L option' is not a kind that I recognise. (I had expected
something like 'number' or 'object' - see the Kinds index for what's
available.)
In 'To decide what L option is get key (key - value of kind K)
in/from/of (M - map of any to value of kind L)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of any to value of
kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To decide what L is get key (key - K) in/from/of (M - map of value
of kind K to value of kind L) or (backup - L)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of value of kind K to
value of kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes
here (like 'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To decide what L is get key (key - value of kind K) in/from/of (M -
map of any to value of kind L) or (backup - L)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of any to value of
kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The phrase you describe in 'To decide what L option is (M - map of value
of kind K to value of kind L) => (key - K)' data structures by dannii
willis seems to be trying to decide a
value, but 'L option' is not a kind that I recognise. (I had expected
something like 'number' or 'object' - see the Kinds index for what's
available.)
In 'To decide what L option is (M - map of value of kind K to value of
kind L) => (key - K)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of value of kind K to
value of kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes
here (like 'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide what L option is (M - map of value
of kind K to value of kind L) => (key - K)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L is (C - couple
of value of kind K and value of kind L) => 2' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide what L option is (M - map of value
of kind K to value of kind L) => (key - K)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (C - couple
of value of kind K and value of kind L) => 1' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide what L option is (M - map of value
of kind K to value of kind L) => (key - K)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (A - any)
as a/an (name of kind of value K) or (backup - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The phrase you describe in 'To decide what L option is (M - map of any
to value of kind L) => (key - value of kind K)' data structures by dannii
willis seems to be trying to decide a
value, but 'L option' is not a kind that I recognise. (I had expected
something like 'number' or 'object' - see the Kinds index for what's
available.)
In 'To decide what L option is (M - map of any to value of kind L) =>
(key - value of kind K)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of any to value of
kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide what L option is (M - map of any
to value of kind L) => (key - value of kind K)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L is (C - couple
of value of kind K and value of kind L) => 2' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide what L option is (M - map of any
to value of kind L) => (key - value of kind K)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (C - couple
of value of kind K and value of kind L) => 1' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide what L option is (M - map of any
to value of kind L) => (key - value of kind K)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (A - any)
as a/an (name of kind of value K) or (backup - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
In 'To decide what L is (M - map of value of kind K to value of kind L)
=> (key - K) or/|| (backup - L)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of value of kind K to
value of kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes
here (like 'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To decide what L is (M - map of any to value of kind L) => (key -
value of kind K) or/|| (backup - L)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of any to value of
kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In Chapter - Maps - Deleting keys in the extension Data Structures by Dannii
Willis:
In 'To delete key (key - K) in/from/of (M - map of value of kind K to
value of kind L)' data
structures by dannii willis, the text 'map of value of kind K to value of
kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To delete key (key - value of kind K) in/from/of (M - map of any to
value of kind L)' data
structures by dannii willis, the text 'map of any to value of kind L' after
the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a number', or
'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In Chapter - Maps - Iterating in the extension Data Structures by Dannii
Willis:
In 'To repeat with (key - nonexisting K variable) in/from/of (M - map of
value of kind K to value of kind L) keys begin -- end loop' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of value of kind K to
value of kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes
here (like 'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To repeat with (val - nonexisting L variable) in/from/of (M - map of
value of kind K to value of kind L) values begin -- end loop' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of value of kind K to
value of kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes
here (like 'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To repeat with (key - nonexisting K variable) and/to/=> (val -
nonexisting L variable) in/from/of (M - map of value of kind K to value of
kind L) begin -- end loop' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of value of kind K to
value of kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes
here (like 'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In Chapter - Nulls in the extension Data Structures by Dannii Willis:
The phrase you describe in 'To decide which null is null' data structures by dannii
willis seems to be trying to decide a
value, but 'null' is not a kind that I recognise. (I had expected something
like 'number' or 'object' - see the Kinds index for what's available.)
In Chapter - Options in the extension Data Structures by Dannii Willis:
The phrase you describe in 'To decide what K option is (V - value of
kind K) as an option' data structures by dannii
willis seems to be trying to decide a
value, but 'K option' is not a kind that I recognise. (I had expected
something like 'number' or 'object' - see the Kinds index for what's
available.)
The phrase you describe in 'To decide what K option is (name of kind of
value K) none option' data structures by dannii
willis seems to be trying to decide a
value, but 'K option' is not a kind that I recognise. (I had expected
something like 'number' or 'object' - see the Kinds index for what's
available.)
In 'To decide if (O - a value option) is some' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'a value option' after the
hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a number', or 'a
vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (O - a value option) is some' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L is (M - map of
any to value of kind L) => (key - value of kind K) or/|| (backup - L)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (O - a value option) is some' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L is (M - map of
value of kind K to value of kind L) => (key - K) or/|| (backup - L)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (O - a value option) is some' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L is (C - couple
of value of kind K and value of kind L) => 2' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (O - a value option) is some' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (C - couple
of value of kind K and value of kind L) => 1' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (O - a value option) is some' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (A - any)
as a/an (name of kind of value K) or (backup - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (O - a value option) is some' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L option is (M -
map of any to value of kind L) => (key - value of kind K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (O - a value option) is some' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L option is (M -
map of value of kind K to value of kind L) => (key - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (O - a value option) is some' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L result is (C -
closure value of kind K -> value of kind L) applied to (P1 - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (O - a value option) is some' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K result is (A -
any) as a/an (name of kind of value K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
In 'To if (O - value of kind K option) is some let (V - nonexisting K
variable) be the value begin -- end loop' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'value of kind K option'
after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a
number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To decide if (O - a value option) is none' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'a value option' after the
hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a number', or 'a
vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (O - a value option) is none' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L is (M - map of
any to value of kind L) => (key - value of kind K) or/|| (backup - L)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (O - a value option) is none' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L is (M - map of
value of kind K to value of kind L) => (key - K) or/|| (backup - L)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (O - a value option) is none' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L is (C - couple
of value of kind K and value of kind L) => 2' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (O - a value option) is none' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (C - couple
of value of kind K and value of kind L) => 1' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (O - a value option) is none' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is (A - any)
as a/an (name of kind of value K) or (backup - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (O - a value option) is none' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L option is (M -
map of any to value of kind L) => (key - value of kind K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (O - a value option) is none' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L option is (M -
map of value of kind K to value of kind L) => (key - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (O - a value option) is none' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what L result is (C -
closure value of kind K -> value of kind L) applied to (P1 - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (O - a value option) is none' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K result is (A -
any) as a/an (name of kind of value K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
In 'To decide what K is value of (O - value of kind K option) or (backup
- K)' data
structures by dannii willis, the text 'value of kind K option' after the
hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a number', or 'a
vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In Chapter - Promises - Creating and resolving in the extension Data
Structures by Dannii Willis:
The phrase you describe in 'To decide what K promise is (name of kind of
value K) promise' data
structures by dannii willis seems to be trying to decide a value, but 'K
promise' is not a kind that I recognise. (I had expected something like
'number' or 'object' - see the Kinds index for what's available.)
The phrase you describe in 'To decide what null result is resolve (P - a
value of kind K promise) with (R - K result)' data structures by dannii
willis seems to be trying to decide a
value, but 'null result' is not a kind that I recognise. (I had expected
something like 'number' or 'object' - see the Kinds index for what's
available.)
In 'To decide what null result is resolve (P - a value of kind K
promise) with (R - K result)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'a value of kind K
promise' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The phrase you describe in 'To decide what null result is resolve (P - a
value of kind K promise) with (val - K)' data structures by dannii
willis seems to be trying to decide a
value, but 'null result' is not a kind that I recognise. (I had expected
something like 'number' or 'object' - see the Kinds index for what's
available.)
In 'To decide what null result is resolve (P - a value of kind K
promise) with (val - K)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'a value of kind K
promise' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The phrase you describe in 'To decide what K promise is (val - value of
kind K) as a successful/-- promise' data structures by dannii
willis seems to be trying to decide a
value, but 'K promise' is not a kind that I recognise. (I had expected
something like 'number' or 'object' - see the Kinds index for what's
available.)
The phrase you describe in 'To decide what K promise is (val - text) as
a failed (name of kind of value K) promise' data structures by dannii
willis seems to be trying to decide a
value, but 'K promise' is not a kind that I recognise. (I had expected
something like 'number' or 'object' - see the Kinds index for what's
available.)
The phrase you describe in 'To decide what K result option is value of
(P - a value of kind K promise)' data structures by dannii
willis seems to be trying to decide a
value, but 'K result option' is not a kind that I recognise. (I had
expected something like 'number' or 'object' - see the Kinds index for
what's available.)
In 'To decide what K result option is value of (P - a value of kind K
promise)' data
structures by dannii willis, the text 'a value of kind K promise' after the
hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a number', or 'a
vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide what K result option is value of
(P - a value of kind K promise)' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what K is value of (O
- value of kind K option) or (backup - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
In Chapter - Promises - Attaching handlers in the extension Data Structures by
Dannii Willis:
In 'To attach success/-- handler/-- (H - a phrase K -> nothing) to (P -
a value of kind K promise)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'a value of kind K
promise' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To attach success/-- handler/-- (H - a K based rulebook) to (P - a
value of kind K promise)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'a value of kind K
promise' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To attach failure handler/-- (H - a phrase text -> nothing) to (P -
a value of kind K promise)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'a value of kind K
promise' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To attach failure handler/-- (H - a text based rulebook) to (P - a
value of kind K promise)' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'a value of kind K
promise' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In Chapter - Results in the extension Data Structures by Dannii Willis:
The phrase you describe in 'To decide what K result is (V - value of
kind K) as a/an ok/okay/-- result' data structures by dannii
willis seems to be trying to decide a
value, but 'K result' is not a kind that I recognise. (I had expected
something like 'number' or 'object' - see the Kinds index for what's
available.)
The phrase you describe in 'To decide what K result is (name of kind of
value K) error result with message (M - text)' data structures by dannii
willis seems to be trying to decide a
value, but 'K result' is not a kind that I recognise. (I had expected
something like 'number' or 'object' - see the Kinds index for what's
available.)
In 'To decide if (R - a value result) is ok/okay' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'a value result' after the
hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a number', or 'a
vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (R - a value result) is
ok/okay' data
structures by dannii willis and 'To decide what L is (M - map of any to
value of kind L) => (key - value of kind K) or/|| (backup - L)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (R - a value result) is
ok/okay' data
structures by dannii willis and 'To decide what L is (M - map of value of
kind K to value of kind L) => (key - K) or/|| (backup - L)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (R - a value result) is
ok/okay' data
structures by dannii willis and 'To decide what L is (C - couple of value of
kind K and value of kind L) => 2' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (R - a value result) is
ok/okay' data
structures by dannii willis and 'To decide what K is (C - couple of value of
kind K and value of kind L) => 1' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (R - a value result) is
ok/okay' data
structures by dannii willis and 'To decide what K is (A - any) as a/an (name
of kind of value K) or (backup - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (R - a value result) is
ok/okay' data
structures by dannii willis and 'To decide what L option is (M - map of any
to value of kind L) => (key - value of kind K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (R - a value result) is
ok/okay' data
structures by dannii willis and 'To decide what L option is (M - map of
value of kind K to value of kind L) => (key - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (R - a value result) is
ok/okay' data
structures by dannii willis and 'To decide what L result is (C - closure
value of kind K -> value of kind L) applied to (P1 - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (R - a value result) is
ok/okay' data
structures by dannii willis and 'To decide what K result is (A - any) as
a/an (name of kind of value K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
In 'To if (R - value of kind K result) is ok/okay let (V - nonexisting K
variable) be the value begin -- end loop' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'value of kind K result'
after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a
number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To decide if (R - a value result) is an/-- error' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'a value result' after the
hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a number', or 'a
vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (R - a value result) is an/--
error' data
structures by dannii willis and 'To decide what L is (M - map of any to
value of kind L) => (key - value of kind K) or/|| (backup - L)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (R - a value result) is an/--
error' data
structures by dannii willis and 'To decide what L is (M - map of value of
kind K to value of kind L) => (key - K) or/|| (backup - L)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (R - a value result) is an/--
error' data
structures by dannii willis and 'To decide what L is (C - couple of value of
kind K and value of kind L) => 2' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (R - a value result) is an/--
error' data
structures by dannii willis and 'To decide what K is (C - couple of value of
kind K and value of kind L) => 1' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (R - a value result) is an/--
error' data
structures by dannii willis and 'To decide what K is (A - any) as a/an (name
of kind of value K) or (backup - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (R - a value result) is an/--
error' data
structures by dannii willis and 'To decide what L option is (M - map of any
to value of kind L) => (key - value of kind K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (R - a value result) is an/--
error' data
structures by dannii willis and 'To decide what L option is (M - map of
value of kind K to value of kind L) => (key - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (R - a value result) is an/--
error' data
structures by dannii willis and 'To decide what L result is (C - closure
value of kind K -> value of kind L) applied to (P1 - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To decide if (R - a value result) is an/--
error' data
structures by dannii willis and 'To decide what K result is (A - any) as
a/an (name of kind of value K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
In 'To if (R - value result) is an/-- error let (V - nonexisting text
variable) be the error message begin -- end loop' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'value result' after the
hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a number', or 'a
vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To decide what K is value of (R - value of kind K result) or (backup
- K)' data
structures by dannii willis, the text 'value of kind K result' after the
hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a number', or 'a
vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In Chapter - Unchecked phrases in the extension Data Structures by Dannii
Willis:
In 'To decide what K is (A - any) as a/an (name of kind of value K)
unchecked' data
structures by dannii willis, the text 'any' after the hyphen should tell me
what kind of value goes here (like 'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's
not something I recognise.
In 'To decide what L is get key (key - K) in/from/of (M - map of value
of kind K to value of kind L) unchecked' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of value of kind K to
value of kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes
here (like 'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To decide what L is get key (key - value of kind K) in/from/of (M -
map of any to value of kind L) unchecked' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of any to value of
kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To decide what L is (M - map of value of kind K to value of kind L)
=> (key - K) unchecked' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of value of kind K to
value of kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes
here (like 'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To decide what L is (M - map of any to value of kind L) => (key -
value of kind K) unchecked' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'map of any to value of
kind L' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
In 'To decide what K is value of (O - value of kind K option) unchecked'
(Dannii Willis/Data Structures.i7x, line 1962),
the text 'value of kind K option' after the hyphen should tell me what kind
of value goes here (like 'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not
something I recognise.
In 'To resolve (P - a value of kind K promise) with (R - K result)
unchecked' data
structures by dannii willis, the text 'a value of kind K promise' after the
hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a number', or 'a
vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The two phrase definitions 'To resolve (P - a value of kind K promise)
with (R - K result) unchecked' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what null result is
resolve (P - a value of kind K promise) with (val - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To resolve (P - a value of kind K promise)
with (R - K result) unchecked' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what null result is
resolve (P - a value of kind K promise) with (R - K result)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
In 'To resolve (P - a value of kind K promise) with (R - K) unchecked' data structures by dannii
willis, the text 'a value of kind K
promise' after the hyphen should tell me what kind of value goes here (like
'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
The two phrase definitions 'To resolve (P - a value of kind K promise)
with (R - K) unchecked' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what null result is
resolve (P - a value of kind K promise) with (val - K)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
The two phrase definitions 'To resolve (P - a value of kind K promise)
with (R - K) unchecked' data structures by dannii
willis and 'To decide what null result is
resolve (P - a value of kind K promise) with (R - K result)' data structures by dannii
willis make the same wording produce two
different kinds of value, which is not allowed.
In 'To decide what K is value of (R - value of kind K result) unchecked'
(Dannii Willis/Data Structures.i7x, line 1971),
the text 'value of kind K result' after the hyphen should tell me what kind
of value goes here (like 'a number', or 'a vehicle'), but it's not
something I recognise.
In 'To decide what text is error message of (R - a value result)
unchecked' data
structures by dannii willis, the text 'a value result' after the hyphen
should tell me what kind of value goes here (like 'a number', or 'a
vehicle'), but it's not something I recognise.
++ Ended: Translation failed: 170 problems found
Fancy Status Lines by Dannii Willis Version 1/130201
(I see no description here.)
ni
++ 0% (Reading text)++ 5% (Analysing sentences)
In Part - Making a fancy status window, Chapter - Replacing the fill the status
line phrase in the extension Fancy Status Lines by Dannii Willis:
In the sentence 'Section - Replacing the fill the status line phrase (in
place of Section 1 - Spacing and Pausing in Basic Screen Effects by Emily
Short)' fancy status
lines by dannii willis, it looks as if you intend to replace a section of
source text from the extension 'Basic Screen Effects by Emily Short', but
that extension does not seem to have any heading called 'Section 1 -
Spacing and Pausing'. (The version I loaded was 7/140425.)
++ Ended: Translation failed: 1 problem found
"A low level event handling system"
"A low level utility library for managing Glk references after restarting or restoring"
"Provides functions for controlling colours and reverse styling at character granularity"
"Core definitions which other Glulx/Glk extensions depend on"
High Performance Indexed Text by Dannii Willis Version 1/121014
This extension improves the performance of Indexed Text and Regular Expressions by altering much of their template code. There are no changes to how you use either feature.
ni
++ 0% (Reading text)++ 5% (Analysing sentences)
++ 15% (Drawing inferences)
++ 20% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 23% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 26% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 29% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 32% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 35% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 38% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 41% (Generating code)
++ 44% (Generating code)
++ 47% (Generating code)
++ 50% (Generating code)
++ 53% (Generating code)
++ 56% (Generating code)
++ 59% (Generating code)
++ 62% (Generating code)
++ 65% (Generating code)
++ 68% (Generating code)
++ 71% (Generating code)
++ 74% (Generating code)
++ 77% (Generating code)
++ 80% (Generating code)
++ 83% (Generating code)
++ 86% (Generating code)
++ 89% (Generating code)
++ 92% (Generating code)
++ 95% (Generating code)
++ 98% (Generating code)
In Section - Template replacements in the extension High Performance Indexed
Text by Dannii Willis:
You wrote 'Include (- [ BlkValueCopy blockto blockfrom [...] ^"; rfalse;
} return blockto; ]; -) instead of "Deep Copy" in "BlockValues.i6t"' (Dannii Willis/High Performance Indexed Text.i7x, line 91):
but that template file didn't have a part with that name, so this attempt
to intervene had no effect. Each template file is divided internally into a
number of named parts, and you have to quote their names precisely.
(Looking at the typeset form of the template, available at the Inform
website, may help.)
You wrote 'Include (- #ifndef IT_MemoryBufferSize; Cons [...] f; }
FreeBlkStruct( ITA ); ]; -) instead of "Casting" in "IndexedText.i6t"' (Dannii Willis/High Performance Indexed Text.i7x, line 153):
but no template file of that name was ever read in, so this attempt to
intervene had no effect. The template files have names like 'Output.i6t',
'Parser.i6t' and so on. (Looking at the typeset form of the template,
available at the Inform website, may help.)
You wrote 'Include (- [ INDEXED_TEXT_TY_Compare indtlef [...] dtright)
== 0) rfalse; rtrue; ]; -) instead of "Comparison" in "IndexedText.i6t"' (Dannii Willis/High Performance Indexed Text.i7x, line 304):
again, no template file of that name was ever read in.
You wrote 'Include (- [ INDEXED_TEXT_TY_Hash indt rv l [...] eBlkStruct(
ITA ); return rv; ]; -) instead of "Hashing" in "IndexedText.i6t"' (Dannii Willis/High Performance Indexed Text.i7x, line 350):
again, no template file of that name was ever read in.
You wrote 'Include (- [ INDEXED_TEXT_TY_Say indt ch i [...] dif; }
FreeBlkStruct( ITA ); ]; -) instead of "Printing" in "IndexedText.i6t"' (Dannii Willis/High Performance Indexed Text.i7x, line 375):
again, no template file of that name was ever read in.
You wrote 'Include (- [ INDEXED_TEXT_TY_WriteFile txb l [...] } }
FreeBlkStruct( ITA ); ]; -) instead of "Serialisation" in
"IndexedText.i6t"' (Dannii Willis/High Performance Indexed Text.i7x, line 407):
again, no template file of that name was ever read in.
You wrote 'Include (- [ INDEXED_TEXT_TY_ROGPR indt ITA [...] oping
return GPR_PREPOSITION; ]; -) instead of "Recognition-only-GPR" in
"IndexedText.i6t"' (Dannii Willis/High Performance Indexed Text.i7x, line 441):
again, no template file of that name was ever read in.
You wrote 'Include (- [ IT_ReplaceText blobtype indt fi [...] ndt,
cindt); BlkFree(cindt); ]; -) instead of "Replace Text" in
"IndexedText.i6t"' (Dannii Willis/High Performance Indexed Text.i7x, line 495):
again, no template file of that name was ever read in.
You wrote 'Include (- [ IT_CharacterLength indt ch i ds [...] th(indt)
== 0) rtrue; rfalse; ]; -) instead of "Character Length" in
"IndexedText.i6t"' (Dannii Willis/High Performance Indexed Text.i7x, line 566):
again, no template file of that name was ever read in.
You wrote 'Include (- [ IT_Concatenate indt_to indt_fro [...] blob type
***^"; rfalse; } ]; -) instead of "Concatenation" in "IndexedText.i6t"' (Dannii Willis/High Performance Indexed Text.i7x, line 605):
again, no template file of that name was ever read in.
++ Ended: Translation failed: 10 problems found
"Record and review highscores to an external file"
(I see no description here.)
ni
++ 0% (Reading text)++ 5% (Analysing sentences)
++ 15% (Drawing inferences)
In Chapter - Hyperlinks in the extension Hyperlinks by Dannii Willis:
The sentence 'Processing hyperlinks for something is an activity on
g-windows' hyperlinks by dannii
willis appears to say two things are the same - I
am reading 'Processing hyperlinks for something' and 'activity on
g-windows' as two different things, and therefore it makes no sense to say
that one is the other: it would be like saying that 'Tarzan is Jane'. It
would be all right if the second thing were the name of a kind, perhaps
with properties: for instance 'Treehouse is a lighted room' says that
something called Treehouse exists and that it is a 'room', which is a kind
I know about, combined with a property called 'lighted' which I also know
about.
++ Ended: Translation failed: 1 problem found
"Handles undo using external files for very big story files"
"Provides support for parsing and generating JSON"
Menus by Dannii Willis Version 1/160728
"Display full-screen menus defined by tables"
Mutable Kinds by Dannii Willis Version 1/121012
"Change the default values of the properties of Mutable Kinds at run-time"
Simple Unit Tests by Dannii Willis Version 1/130803
"Very simple unit tests."
ni
++ 0% (Reading text)++ 5% (Analysing sentences)
++ 15% (Drawing inferences)
++ 20% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 23% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 26% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 29% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 32% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 35% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 38% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 41% (Generating code)
++ 44% (Generating code)
++ 47% (Generating code)
++ 50% (Generating code)
++ 53% (Generating code)
++ 56% (Generating code)
++ 59% (Generating code)
++ 62% (Generating code)
++ 65% (Generating code)
++ 68% (Generating code)
++ 71% (Generating code)
++ 74% (Generating code)
++ 77% (Generating code)
++ 80% (Generating code)
++ 83% (Generating code)
In the sentence 'consider the rule at address addr' simple unit tests by dannii
willis, I was expecting to read a rule, but
instead found some text that I couldn't understand - 'consider the rule'.
I was trying to match this phrase:
(consider the rule - rule) at (address addr - time)
But I didn't recognise 'consider the rule' or 'address addr'.
++ 86% (Generating code)
++ 89% (Generating code)
++ Ended: Translation failed: 1 problem found
"A system for precomputing slow startup code"
"Handles undo using external files for very big story files"
i6
Inform 6.36 for Linux (24th January 2022)In: 1 source code files 66058 syntactic lines
56279 textual lines 2058599 characters (ISO 8859-1 Latin1)
Allocated:
8084 symbols 2632544 bytes of memory
Out: Glulx story file 1.220517 (587K long):
21 classes 42 objects
232 global vars 83047 variable/array space
96 verbs 316 dictionary entries
179 grammar lines (version 2) 251 grammar tokens (unlimited)
101 actions 37 attributes (maximum 56)
37 common props (maximum 253) 18 individual props (unlimited)
109202 characters used in text 85581 bytes compressed (rate 0.783)
0 abbreviations (maximum 64) 2893 routines (unlimited)
69692 instructions of code 39419 sequence points
105472 bytes writable memory used 495360 bytes read-only memory used
600832 bytes used in machine 1073140992 bytes free in machine
File "auto.inf"; Line 2981 # Error: No such constant as "GL__M"
Compiled with 1 error and 1648 suppressed warnings
Completed in 0.076 seconds
Xorshift by Dannii Willis Version 1/140818
"Allows Inform 7's random number generator to be replaced with one that is consistent across all interpreters"